🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about that comments made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown would have been understandable. Instead, he invoked the continued absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all love a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the previous seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it presented the chance to beat the three best competitors in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is more than within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match what other person sensibly had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing between her and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is ranked fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive power on both front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a several dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing slump of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four sets, a victory that only felt tenuous for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic saved break point after break point, extending the run to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a terrible service game to drop serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use excessive energy to win it. Down match points in the last game, his primary delivery floated to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the next round and never particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, willing to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America failing to spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American told a journalist in the summer of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {